pullmeafredo
05/01
At the risk of making things overly-complicated, there could also be a sliding scale where missing the MWR by fewer than five games (quite possibly just bad luck,
pullmeafredo
05/01
as it was in vinzander's case) results in the loss of a 1st round pick, while missing it by 5+ games results in a combination of the loss of the 1st round pick plus whatever IFA restrictions the...
vinzander
05/01
Dudes, I missed ya :) I already went into the clubhouse and dapped up the fellas and thanked them for getting me fired last season. Man, were they surprised to see me. Told them it's 72 wins this...
joekendall
05/01
Good suggestions outlaw
outlaw 6-4-3
05/01
Suggestion #2: Moving gorward-- in addition to listed penalties-- I suggest any MWR violator is not up for consideration to return until his team has sat freely available for 2 weeks after roll date.
outlaw 6-4-3
05/01
Suggestion #1: in order to achieve 1st round draft penalty, I suggest Vinzander elevate a prospect low on his board with both an overall less than 45, AND a "probably won't sign" designa...
outlaw 6-4-3
05/01
Commissioner's Note: Vinzander has agreed to forfeit his 1st round pick as penalty in order to rejoin us. (I believe he has 7th overall pick) He will also now need 72 wins to meet (3rd year) MWR...
sordie
05/01
Mistro's suggestion (forfeiture of following season R1 pick + limit of $15MM for any individual IFA for following season) strikes me as a solid deterrence to tanking.
sordie
05/01
In this climate, we obviously don't want to toss aside good owners, but still need a fail-safe to prevent a race to the bottom and adoption of the tank model of team-building.
hirschjt
05/01
Im good with bringing him back but agree there would be a penalty to go with it such as forfeiting his 1st overall draft pick.